2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Mazda CX-90 vs Toyota C-HR
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The C-HR starts $2,200 lower (MSRP $44,900 vs $47,100 for the CX-90).
- The C-HR is fully electric; the CX-90 burns fuel.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the C-HR: 9.9/10 vs 5.6/10.
- Transport Canada lists 0 safety recalls for the 2026 CX-90 and 1 for the C-HR.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | $47,100 | $44,900 |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 5.6/10 | 9.9/10 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | Electric |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 9.2 | 1.8 |
| City | 9.8 | 1.7 |
| Highway | 8.5 | 2 |
| Electric range | 43 km | 496 km |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 99 | — |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | 340 hp | 338 hp |
| Seats | 8 | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD, FWD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | Yes |
| Fuel required | Premium gasoline / Regular gasoline | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 9 | 3 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 1 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.