2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Acura ADX vs Mazda CX-90
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The ADX starts $1,020 lower (MSRP $46,080 vs $47,100 for the CX-90).
- The ADX uses 0.7 L/100 km less combined (8.5 vs 9.2), about 140 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the ADX: 6.4/10 vs 5.6/10.
- The CX-90 has more power: up to 340 hp vs 190 hp.
- The CX-90 seats up to 8, vs 5.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | AcuraAcura ADX |  |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | $46,080 | $47,100 |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 6.4/10 | 5.6/10 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Plug-in hybrid |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 8.5 | 9.2 |
| City | 9.1 | 9.8 |
| Highway | 7.7 | 8.5 |
| Electric range | — | 43 km |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | — | 99 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | 190 hp | 340 hp |
| Seats | 5 | 8 |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | Yes |
| Fuel required | Premium gasoline | Premium gasoline / Regular gasoline |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 3 | 9 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.