Official NRCan 2026 ratings · Prices in Canadian dollars

2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings

Mazda CX-70 vs Volvo XC60 T8

Key differences

From published figures, not a road test
  • The XC60 T8 uses 0.7 L/100 km less combined (8.5 vs 9.2), about 140 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
  • The XC60 T8 goes 15 km further on electricity (58 vs 43 km).
  • Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the XC60 T8: 6.4/10 vs 5.6/10.
  • Transport Canada lists 0 safety recalls for the 2026 CX-70 and 1 for the XC60 T8.
Spec
MSRP from$49,750—
Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10)5.6/106.4/10
BodySUVSUV
FuelPlug-in hybridPlug-in hybrid
Combined (L or Le/100 km)9.28.5
City9.88.5
Highway8.48.5
Electric range43 km58 km
Level 2 charge (240 V)——
Total range (PHEV)——
CO2 (g/km)9972
CO2 rating (out of 10)——
Smog rating (out of 10)——
Max power340 hp—
Seats5—
DrivetrainAWDAWD
AWD / 4WD offered (winter)YesYes
Fuel requiredPremium gasoline / Regular gasoline—
Manual offeredNoNo
Rated configurations61
2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada)01

The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.

Other match-ups