2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Mazda CX-70 SC vs Volvo XC60 T8
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The XC60 T8 uses 0.5 L/100 km less combined (8.5 vs 9), about 100 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- The XC60 T8 goes 7 km further on electricity (58 vs 51 km).
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the XC60 T8: 6.4/10 vs 5.8/10.
- Transport Canada lists 0 safety recalls for the 2026 CX-70 SC and 1 for the XC60 T8.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  | VolvoVolvo XC60 T8 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | $48,999 | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 5.8/10 | 6.4/10 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | Plug-in hybrid |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 9 | 8.5 |
| City | 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Highway | 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Electric range | 51 km | 58 km |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 83 | 72 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | 323 hp | — |
| Seats | 5 | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | Yes |
| Fuel required | Premium gasoline | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 2 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 1 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.