2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Mazda CX-5 vs Mitsubishi Outlander
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The CX-5 starts $98 lower (MSRP $36,300 vs $36,398 for the Outlander).
- The Outlander uses 0.4 L/100 km less combined (8.6 vs 9), about 80 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the Outlander: 6.3/10 vs 5.8/10.
- The CX-5 has more power: up to 187 hp vs 174 hp.
- Transport Canada lists 0 safety recalls for the 2026 CX-5 and 1 for the Outlander.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | | MitsubishiMitsubishi Outlander |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | $36,300 | $36,398 |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 5.8/10 | 6.3/10 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Plug-in hybrid |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 9 | 8.6 |
| City | 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Highway | 7.9 | 7.8 |
| Electric range | — | 72 km |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 212 | 58 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | 187 hp | 174 hp |
| Seats | 5 | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | Yes |
| Fuel required | Regular gasoline | Regular gasoline |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 5 | 14 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 1 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.