2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Ford Mustang GTD vs Rolls-Royce Ghost
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The Ghost uses 2.8 L/100 km less combined (16.4 vs 19.2), about 560 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the Ghost: 1.3/10 vs 1/10.
- Transport Canada lists 4 safety recalls for the 2026 Mustang GTD and 0 for the Ghost.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | FordFord Mustang GTD | Rolls-RoyceRolls-Royce Ghost |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 1/10 | 1.3/10 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 19.2 | 16.4 |
| City | 23.5 | 19.7 |
| Highway | 13.9 | 12.4 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 451 | 379 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 2 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 4 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.