2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Ferrari Purosangue vs Ford Mustang GTD
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The Purosangue uses 0.2 L/100 km less combined (19 vs 19.2), about 40 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Transport Canada lists 0 safety recalls for the 2026 Purosangue and 4 for the Mustang GTD.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  | FordFord Mustang GTD |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 1.1/10 | 1/10 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 19 | 19.2 |
| City | 22 | 23.5 |
| Highway | 15.3 | 13.9 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 442 | 451 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 4 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.