2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
BMW M5 Touring vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GLC 63 S E
BMWM5 TouringCombined17.5 L/100 kmAhead on 1 pointMercedes-BenzAMG GLC 63 S ECombined11.9 L/100 kmAhead on 2 points
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The AMG GLC 63 S E uses 5.6 L/100 km less combined (11.9 vs 17.5), about 1,120 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- The M5 Touring goes 26 km further on electricity (40 vs 14 km).
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the AMG GLC 63 S E: 1.8/10 vs 1/10.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz AMG GLC 63 S E | |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 1/10 | 1.8/10 |
| Body | Wagon | Wagon |
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | Plug-in hybrid |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 17.5 | 11.9 |
| City | 20.6 | 12.3 |
| Highway | 13.7 | 11.4 |
| Electric range | 40 km | 14 km |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 189 | 235 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.