2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Audi RS 6 Avant quattro vs BMW M5 Touring
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The RS 6 Avant quattro uses 3.1 L/100 km less combined (14.4 vs 17.5), about 620 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the RS 6 Avant quattro: 1.3/10 vs 1/10.
- Transport Canada lists 1 safety recall for the 2026 RS 6 Avant quattro and 0 for the M5 Touring.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 1.3/10 | 1/10 |
| Body | Wagon | Wagon |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Plug-in hybrid |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 14.4 | 17.5 |
| City | 17.1 | 20.6 |
| Highway | 11.2 | 13.7 |
| Electric range | — | 40 km |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 339 | 189 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 1 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.