2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Mercedes-Benz AMG CLA 35 4MATIC vs Nissan Z
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The AMG CLA 35 4MATIC uses 1 L/100 km less combined (9.6 vs 10.6), about 200 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the AMG CLA 35 4MATIC: 8/10 vs 7.6/10.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz AMG CLA 35 4MATIC | NissanNissan Z |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 8/10 | 7.6/10 |
| Body | Coupe | Coupe |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 9.6 | 10.6 |
| City | 10.8 | 12.3 |
| Highway | 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 224 | 250 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 2 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.