2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Mazda CX-70 vs Toyota Highlander
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The CX-70 starts $1,535 lower (MSRP $49,750 vs $51,285 for the Highlander).
- The Highlander uses 2.5 L/100 km less combined (6.7 vs 9.2), about 500 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the Highlander: 7.2/10 vs 5.6/10.
- The CX-70 has more power: up to 340 hp vs 264 hp.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | | |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | $49,750 | $51,285 |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 5.6/10 | 7.2/10 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | Hybrid |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 9.2 | 6.7 |
| City | 9.8 | 6.6 |
| Highway | 8.4 | 6.8 |
| Electric range | 43 km | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 99 | 156 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | 340 hp | 264 hp |
| Seats | 5 | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | Yes |
| Fuel required | Premium gasoline / Regular gasoline | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 6 | 3 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.