2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Ferrari F80 vs Mercedes-Benz AMG 63 4MATIC+
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The AMG 63 4MATIC+ uses 0.6 L/100 km less combined (13.5 vs 14.1), about 120 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  | Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz AMG 63 4MATIC+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 3.6/10 | 3.9/10 |
| Body | Coupe | Coupe |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 14.1 | 13.5 |
| City | 15.9 | 15.3 |
| Highway | 11.8 | 11.3 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 330 | 318 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 3 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.