2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
BMW M4 Competition vs Mercedes-Benz AMG 63 4MATIC+
BMWM4 CompetitionCombined12.7 L/100 kmAhead on 2 pointsMercedes-BenzAMG 63 4MATIC+Combined13.5 L/100 km
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The M4 Competition uses 0.8 L/100 km less combined (12.7 vs 13.5), about 160 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the M4 Competition: 5.8/10 vs 3.9/10.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz AMG 63 4MATIC+ | |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 5.8/10 | 3.9/10 |
| Body | Coupe | Coupe |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 12.7 | 13.5 |
| City | 14.7 | 15.3 |
| Highway | 10.2 | 11.3 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 293 | 318 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 2 | 3 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.