2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
BMW 760i xDrive vs Cadillac CT5-V
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The CT5-V uses 0.3 L/100 km less combined (11.2 vs 11.5), about 60 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the CT5-V: 3.3/10 vs 2.9/10.
- Only the CT5-V offers AWD or 4WD, useful in a Canadian winter.
- Transport Canada lists 1 safety recall for the 2026 760i xDrive and 0 for the CT5-V.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | CadillacCadillac CT5-V | |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 2.9/10 | 3.3/10 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 11.5 | 11.2 |
| City | 13.3 | 13.2 |
| Highway | 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 265 | 263 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | AWD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | Yes |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 4 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 1 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.