2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Aston Martin Valhalla vs Ferrari 849 Testarossa
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The 849 Testarossa uses 2.1 L/100 km less combined (12.9 vs 15), about 420 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- The 849 Testarossa goes 4 km further on electricity (14 vs 10 km).
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the 849 Testarossa: 5.4/10 vs 2.6/10.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 2.6/10 | 5.4/10 |
| Body | Coupe | Coupe |
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | Plug-in hybrid |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 15 | 12.9 |
| City | 17.3 | 14.1 |
| Highway | 12.2 | 11.3 |
| Electric range | 10 km | 14 km |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 302 | 237 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.