2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Aston Martin Valhalla vs Mercedes-Benz AMG 63 S E
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The AMG 63 S E uses 1.7 L/100 km less combined (13.3 vs 15), about 340 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- The AMG 63 S E goes 6 km further on electricity (16 vs 10 km).
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the AMG 63 S E: 4.3/10 vs 2.6/10.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | | Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz AMG 63 S E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 2.6/10 | 4.3/10 |
| Body | Coupe | Coupe |
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | Plug-in hybrid |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 15 | 13.3 |
| City | 17.3 | 14.3 |
| Highway | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Electric range | 10 km | 16 km |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 302 | 262 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.