2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 SUV vs Volvo V60 CC B5
Mercedes-BenzGLA 250 SUVCombined8.2 L/100 kmAhead on 2 pointsVolvoV60 CC B5Combined8.9 L/100 kmAhead on 1 point
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The GLA 250 SUV uses 0.7 L/100 km less combined (8.2 vs 8.9), about 140 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the GLA 250 SUV: 5.3/10 vs 4.3/10.
- Only the V60 CC B5 offers AWD or 4WD, useful in a Canadian winter.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz GLA 250 SUV | VolvoVolvo V60 CC B5 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 5.3/10 | 4.3/10 |
| Body | Wagon | Wagon |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 8.2 | 8.9 |
| City | 9.2 | 10.1 |
| Highway | 6.9 | 7.6 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 190 | 210 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | AWD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | Yes |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 1 | 1 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.