2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Mercedes-Benz AMG S 63 E vs Porsche Panamera S E-Hybrid
Mercedes-BenzAMG S 63 ECombined13 L/100 kmPorschePanamera S E-HybridCombined12 L/100 kmAhead on 3 points
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The Panamera S E-Hybrid uses 1 L/100 km less combined (12 vs 13), about 200 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- The Panamera S E-Hybrid goes 17 km further on electricity (43 vs 26 km).
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the Panamera S E-Hybrid: 2.7/10 vs 1.8/10.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz AMG S 63 E | PorschePorsche Panamera S E-Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 1.8/10 | 2.7/10 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | Plug-in hybrid |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 13 | 12 |
| City | 15.3 | 13.3 |
| Highway | 10.2 | 10.5 |
| Electric range | 26 km | 43 km |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 190 | 130 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.