2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Honda HR-V vs Mercedes-Benz AMG 53 4MATIC+
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The HR-V uses 3 L/100 km less combined (8.3 vs 11.3), about 600 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the HR-V: 4.8/10 vs 2.3/10.
- Only the HR-V offers AWD or 4WD, useful in a Canadian winter.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  | Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz AMG 53 4MATIC+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | $30,300 | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 4.8/10 | 2.3/10 |
| Body | Wagon | Wagon |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 8.3 | 11.3 |
| City | 9.1 | 12.3 |
| Highway | 7.4 | 10 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 194 | 263 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | 158 hp | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD, FWD | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 2 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.