2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-50
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The CX-50 uses 0.2 L/100 km less combined (6.2 vs 6.4), about 40 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Transport Canada lists 1 safety recall for the 2026 CR-V and 0 for the CX-50.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  | MazdaMazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | $36,975 | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 7.4/10 | 7.4/10 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Fuel | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 6.4 | 6.2 |
| City | 6 | 6.1 |
| Highway | 6.9 | 6.4 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 151 | 145 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | 204 hp | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD, FWD | 4WD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | Yes |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 4 | 3 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 1 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.