2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
GMC Canyon vs Ram 1500 eTorque
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The 1500 eTorque uses 0.6 L/100 km less combined (10.8 vs 11.4), about 120 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the 1500 eTorque: 5.6/10 vs 4.9/10.
- Transport Canada lists 2 safety recalls for the 2026 Canyon and 7 for the 1500 eTorque.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  | |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 4.9/10 | 5.6/10 |
| Body | Pickup | Pickup |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 11.4 | 10.8 |
| City | 12.3 | 12 |
| Highway | 10.2 | 9.4 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 267 | 253 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | 395 hp |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | Yes |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 2 | 4 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 2 | 7 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.