2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Ford Mustang Dark Horse vs Mercedes-Benz Maybach S 680 4MATIC
FordMustang Dark HorseCombined13.9 L/100 kmAhead on 1 pointMercedes-BenzMaybach S 680 4MATICCombined16.1 L/100 km
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The Mustang Dark Horse uses 2.2 L/100 km less combined (13.9 vs 16.1), about 440 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Transport Canada lists 4 safety recalls for the 2026 Mustang Dark Horse and 0 for the Maybach S 680 4MATIC.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz Maybach S 680 4MATIC | |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 1.6/10 | 1.4/10 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 13.9 | 16.1 |
| City | 16.5 | 19.8 |
| Highway | 10.8 | 11.6 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 326 | 375 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 2 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 4 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.