2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Ford Maverick Lobo vs Honda Ridgeline
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The Maverick Lobo uses 1.8 L/100 km less combined (9.7 vs 11.5), about 360 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the Maverick Lobo: 6.6/10 vs 4.7/10.
- Transport Canada lists 4 safety recalls for the 2026 Maverick Lobo and 0 for the Ridgeline.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  | |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 6.6/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Body | Pickup | Pickup |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 9.7 | 11.5 |
| City | 11.2 | 12.8 |
| Highway | 7.8 | 9.9 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 227 | 271 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | Yes |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 2 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 4 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.