2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Ford Expedition vs Land Rover SV P615 LWB
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The Rover SV P615 LWB uses 0.1 L/100 km less combined (13.2 vs 13.3), about 20 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Only the Expedition offers AWD or 4WD, useful in a Canadian winter.
- Transport Canada lists 2 safety recalls for the 2026 Expedition and 0 for the Rover SV P615 LWB.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | | Land RoverLand Rover SV P615 LWB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 2.2/10 | 2.3/10 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 13.3 | 13.2 |
| City | 15.3 | 15.2 |
| Highway | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 312 | 311 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 2 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.