2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 Bison vs Ford Ranger Raptor
ChevroletColorado ZR2 BisonCombined14.9 L/100 kmFordRanger RaptorCombined14 L/100 kmAhead on 2 points
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The Ranger Raptor uses 0.9 L/100 km less combined (14 vs 14.9), about 180 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the Ranger Raptor: 2.6/10 vs 2.2/10.
- Transport Canada lists 1 safety recall for the 2026 Colorado ZR2 Bison and 6 for the Ranger Raptor.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | ChevroletChevrolet Colorado ZR2 Bison | |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 2.2/10 | 2.6/10 |
| Body | Pickup | Pickup |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 14.9 | 14 |
| City | 14.8 | 14.9 |
| Highway | 15.1 | 12.8 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 350 | 326 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | Yes |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 1 | 6 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.