2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Chevrolet Colorado Mud Terrain vs Nissan Frontier PRO-4X
ChevroletColorado Mud TerrainCombined13.1 L/100 kmNissanFrontier PRO-4XCombined12.9 L/100 kmAhead on 1 point
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The Frontier PRO-4X uses 0.2 L/100 km less combined (12.9 vs 13.1), about 40 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Transport Canada lists 1 safety recall for the 2026 Colorado Mud Terrain and 0 for the Frontier PRO-4X.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | ChevroletChevrolet Colorado Mud Terrain | NissanNissan Frontier PRO-4X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 3.5/10 | 3.7/10 |
| Body | Pickup | Pickup |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 13.1 | 12.9 |
| City | 14 | 14 |
| Highway | 11.9 | 11.6 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 307 | 305 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | Yes |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 1 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.