2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Cadillac CT5-V vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C 43 4MATIC
CadillacCT5-VCombined11.2 L/100 kmAhead on 1 pointMercedes-BenzAMG C 43 4MATICCombined10.8 L/100 kmAhead on 2 points
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The AMG C 43 4MATIC uses 0.4 L/100 km less combined (10.8 vs 11.2), about 80 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the AMG C 43 4MATIC: 3.6/10 vs 3.3/10.
- Only the CT5-V offers AWD or 4WD, useful in a Canadian winter.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | CadillacCadillac CT5-V | Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz AMG C 43 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 3.3/10 | 3.6/10 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 11.2 | 10.8 |
| City | 13.2 | 12.5 |
| Highway | 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 263 | 252 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 4 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.