2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Cadillac CT4 vs Mercedes-Benz C 300 4MATIC
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The C 300 4MATIC uses 0.4 L/100 km less combined (8.7 vs 9.1), about 80 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Only the CT4 offers AWD or 4WD, useful in a Canadian winter.
- Transport Canada lists 0 safety recalls for the 2026 CT4 and 2 for the C 300 4MATIC.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec | | Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz C 300 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 5/10 | 5.3/10 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 9.1 | 8.7 |
| City | 10.6 | 10 |
| Highway | 7.3 | 7.1 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 214 | 204 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | Yes | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 4 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 2 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.