2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
Buick Envista vs Honda HR-V
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The Envista uses 0.4 L/100 km less combined (7.9 vs 8.3), about 80 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the Envista: 6.3/10 vs 4.8/10.
- Only the HR-V offers AWD or 4WD, useful in a Canadian winter.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | $30,300 |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 6.3/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Body | Wagon | Wagon |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 7.9 | 8.3 |
| City | 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Highway | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 185 | 194 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | 158 hp |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | AWD, FWD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | Yes |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 2 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.