2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
BMW XM Label vs Jeep Wrangler JL Unlimited 392
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The Wrangler JL Unlimited 392 uses 0.2 L/100 km less combined (16.8 vs 17), about 40 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Only the Wrangler JL Unlimited 392 offers AWD or 4WD, useful in a Canadian winter.
- Transport Canada lists 0 safety recalls for the 2026 XM Label and 3 for the Wrangler JL Unlimited 392.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  | |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 1.1/10 | 1.1/10 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 17 | 16.8 |
| City | 19.8 | 18.7 |
| Highway | 13.6 | 14.5 |
| Electric range | 48 km | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 163 | 393 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | 4WD |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | Yes |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 3 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.