2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
BMW M5 vs Mercedes-Benz Maybach S 680 4MATIC
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The Maybach S 680 4MATIC uses 0.3 L/100 km less combined (16.1 vs 16.4), about 60 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  | Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz Maybach S 680 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 1.3/10 | 1.4/10 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan |
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 16.4 | 16.1 |
| City | 19.7 | 19.8 |
| Highway | 12.3 | 11.6 |
| Electric range | 47 km | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 164 | 375 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 1 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.