2026Canadian prices and NRCan ratings
BMW M2 vs Nissan Z Nismo
Key differences
From published figures, not a road test- The Z Nismo uses 0.3 L/100 km less combined (12.2 vs 12.5), about 60 L less fuel over 20,000 km.
- Higher Vehonix efficiency score for the Z Nismo: 7/10 vs 6.6/10.
Side by side
Add a third model →| Spec |  | NissanNissan Z Nismo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP from | — | — |
| Vehonix efficiency score (out of 10) | 6.6/10 | 7/10 |
| Body | Coupe | Coupe |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Combined (L or Le/100 km) | 12.5 | 12.2 |
| City | 14.4 | 14.1 |
| Highway | 10 | 9.9 |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Level 2 charge (240 V) | — | — |
| Total range (PHEV) | — | — |
| CO2 (g/km) | 290 | 287 |
| CO2 rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Smog rating (out of 10) | — | — |
| Max power | — | — |
| Seats | — | — |
| Drivetrain | — | — |
| AWD / 4WD offered (winter) | No | No |
| Fuel required | — | — |
| Manual offered | No | No |
| Rated configurations | 2 | 1 |
| 2026 safety recalls (Transport Canada) | 0 | 0 |
The best figure on each row is highlighted. MSRP is the cheapest checked trim; fuel use is the most efficient trim.